Thatcher Law Firm
301-850-1246
Click Here to Email the Firm
View Our Practice Areas

Does The ADEA Prohibit All Discrimination Against Job Applicants?

Thatcher logo.jpgThe Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) prohibits discrimination against workers 40 and over. While the law prohibits discrimination in any aspect of employment, including hiring, it is unclear whether the ADEA prohibits a certain type of discrimination called "disparate impact" discrimination in hiring. One federal court ruled that it does not. Now, a second federal court has ruled the opposite.

Disparate impact discrimination occurs when a system, policy or practice appears to be neutral but actually results in members of a protected class receiving less favorable treatment. Discriminatory intent is not required to prove disparate impact. Such policies are illegal unless they serve a reasonable, non-discriminatory purpose.

Suppose a company chose to hire only Justin Bieber fans. That would likely keep a disproportionate number of people over 40 from getting jobs at that company. Even if its effect was unintentional, the policy might be illegal simply because it disproportionately excludes older folks. To defend itself against an ADEA claim, the company would have to provide a reasonable, age-neutral reason for the policy.

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has ruled that the ADEA prohibits disparate impact discrimination in hiring. In 2016, the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that job applicants cannot bring ADEA claims for disparate impact -- only for intentional discrimination. Recently, the 7th Circuit ruled the other way, allowing ADEA claims for disparate impact in hiring.

Since Maryland is in the 4th Circuit, neither ruling applies directly here. However, there appears to be a trend in favor of the EEOC's interpretation. Certainly, a reasonable argument can be made that the ADEA applies to job applicants with disparate impact claims. Ultimately, the U.S. Supreme Court may have to decide this split between two circuits.

Where might job applicants notice disparate impact discrimination?

If disparate impact claims by job applicants are allowed, one area of potential litigation is the targeting of job ads through Facebook and other social media platforms. Even if job ads are not intentionally targeted toward younger people, they may have a disparate impact against older workers by limiting viewership of the ad to:

  • People with lower salaries (in states where salary histories can be queried)
  • Workers with fewer years of experience
  • Applicants who graduated in certain years
  • Prospects with "young" interests like dating, homebuying, or certain music or entertainment

In determining whether disparate impact claims related to hiring are allowed, federal courts in Maryland will consider the reasoning between both courts' rulings and the EEOC's position. The success of an ADEA disparate impact lawsuit brought by a job applicant will depend in large part upon whether the plaintiff's attorneys can present a persuasive claim that such suits should be allowed.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information
  • Super Lawyer Linda Hitt Thatcher
  • Washingtonian Top Lawyers
  • The Washingtonian | Washington's Top Lawyers 2018
  • The Washingtonian | Washington's Top Lawyers 2017
  • Best Washingtonian 2015
  • Top Lawyers 2013
  • Washingtonian Top Lawyers 2011
  • The Washingtonian | Washington's Top Lawyers 2009
  • Washingtonian Top Lawyers
  • AV Preeminent

Thatcher Law Firm
7849 Belle Point Drive
Greenbelt, MD 20770

Toll Free: 866-604-3882
Phone: 301-850-1246
Fax: 301-441-9602
Map & Directions