Please Note: Due to COVID-19, Full-Service Telephone Consultations Available

COVID-19 Assistance Click Here Thatcher Law Firm
301-850-1246
Click Here to Email the Firm
View Our Practice Areas

Fourth Circuit Upholds Strict Non-Compete-Style Agreement

Non-compete agreements keep employees from competing with the company for a period of time after their employment ends. Non-solicitation agreements can prohibit soliciting former co-workers or former clients on behalf of a new company for a specified period.

In general, these agreements (called "restrictive covenants") need to be drafted carefully because courts see them as restraints on trade. They can materially affect a former employee's job prospects for at least some period of time, and this can only be done with care. When determining whether such agreements are valid, courts typically consider factors such as:

  • Whether the agreement is narrowly tailored to the company's legitimate business interests, as opposed to an effort merely to restrict competition
  • Whether the agreement is reasonable in scope, geographic reach and time period

When restrictive covenants are not narrowly tailored to a legitimate business interest, such as the need to protect proprietary information, courts may find them overbroad and thus invalid. Similarly, if the agreement restricts the employee too much, in too wide of an area or for too long, the agreement may be found unenforceable.

So, it was of some interest recently when a Maryland company and its subsidiaries attempted to enforce a strict incentive plan in connection with non-compete and non-solicitation agreements.

Company paid former employees to continue being loyal

A staffing company called Allegis Group, Inc., and its subsidiaries TEKsystems and Aerotek, provide staffing for the Defense Department and other government agencies and contractors. Employees of the three companies work in close collaboration, with access to each other's proprietary information.

To protect that information, Allegis and the subsidiaries put in place an incentive plan that, in exchange for certain post-separation payments, required continuing loyalty to the companies' interests for 30 months following separation. This incentive plan was offered to select management and highly compensated employees.

Four Aerotek executives had signed non-competes and non-solicitation agreements in connection with the incentive plan. However, they allegedly breached the restrictive covenants while accepting the incentive payments. One executive, for example, set up competing staffing companies and solicited former co-workers to work there. The three companies sued the executives for breach of the non-compete and non-solicitation agreements and sought to have the incentive payments returned.

In their defense, the executives claimed that the agreements and incentive plan were not narrowly tailored to their former employers' legitimate business interests and were therefore unenforceable. The trial court disagreed and ordered the executives to return their incentive payments with interest.

The executives appealed to the Fourth Circuit, which found not only that the plan's terms were reasonable but also that the incentive plan did not have to satisfy the legal requirements of a restrictive covenant. The incentive plan itself, as opposed to the restrictive covenants, did not have to be narrowly tailored to the company's legitimate business interests.

This ruling could have significant implications on what restrictive covenants are allowed in the Fourth Circuit, which contains Maryland, Virginia, West Virginia, North Carolina and South Carolina.

If you have questions about whether your own non-compete or non-solicitation agreements would be enforceable, contact an experienced employment law attorney.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information
  • sl-2020
  • Super Lawyer Linda Hitt Thatcher
  • Washingtonian Top Lawyers
  • The Washingtonian | Washington's Top Lawyers 2018
  • The Washingtonian | Washington's Top Lawyers 2017
  • Best Washingtonian 2015
  • Top Lawyers 2013
  • Washingtonian Top Lawyers 2011
  • The Washingtonian | Washington's Top Lawyers 2009
  • Washingtonian Top Lawyers
  • AV Preeminent

Thatcher Law Firm
7849 Belle Point Drive
Greenbelt, MD 20770

Toll Free: 866-604-3882
Phone: 301-850-1246
Fax: 301-441-9602
Map & Directions